Couple sues Diageo for £40k over ‘angels’ share’ fungus damage

A couple from Bonnybridge in Scotland have sued spirits giant Diageo over claims that ethanol evaporating from a nearby whisky maturation facility caused the formation of a black fungus, which caused £40,000 worth of damage to their home.

Thomas and Gail Chalmers claim that the “nuisance” alcohol vapour contributed to the development of a fungus. This fungus caused damage to their house and outdoor furniture, and has meant that the value of their property has decreased.

In the document filed at the Edinburgh Sessions Court on 13 August, the couple state that the prevalence of the fungus is well-known in the town and that the value of their home has been adversely affected as a result, reducing by between 5-10% due to the effects of the fungus on properties in the area.

The Chalmers bought their house in 2002 for £139,950 and in May 2017 it was valued in the region of £190,000 to £195,000.

They claim the fungus, known as Baudoinia compniacensis, covered the verge tiles, guttering, roof and exterior walls of their house, causing discolouration to their home and a “large number of properties in the vicinity”.

The couple claim they saw evidence of the fungus within a year of moving in, and now clean the back of their property once a year, a job which requires 16 bottles of thin bleach. While undertaking this work themselves, they’ve also paid contractors to clean harder to reach areas of their property such as the guttering.

The Chalmers paid for this work to be carried out about once every two years at a cost of £170.

They have also had to spend money on cleaning their patio and sundeck with power washers, re-painting the garden fence to disguise the discolouration and replacing damaged garden furniture. They allege the fungus has also grown on their cars, which require a full valet service in order to remove the spores.

Diageo in turn claims in the lawsuit that the “blackening complained of is indistinguishable visually or in impact from blackening found in a wide range of other locations, and that it does not cause serious disturbance, substantial inconvenience or material damage.

The company also claims it “has no impact on property values”.

A Diageo spokesperson told the drinks business: “We strongly dispute the claims made against Diageo in this case. We note the Judge’s opinion and will take the time to review this accordingly.

“We care deeply about the long standing relationships we have built with our neighbours and are sympathetic to the concern raised about exterior blackening of some buildings.

“However, exterior blackening visibly exists across many structures in Scotland, including where there are no whisky warehouses, and it is therefore very difficult to say that it is caused by any single environmental factor.“

The issue of the fungus in Bonnybridge was first raised over a decade ago.

In 2014, in a similar complaint, Diageo was sued by hundreds of residents living in the vicinity of its Levenmouth facility over claims the black fungus had damaged their houses, cars and plants.

The Chalmers first launched their case against Diageo in 2017. The drinks giant had attempted to get the case dismissed but this was rejected. Presiding judge at this hearing, Lord Tyre, said he was satisfied that the couple had addressed the concerns raised by Diageo.

Lord Tyre said: “In my opinion the pursuers have given sufficient notice of costs and other losses which, if all were to be established in evidence, might amount to the sum sued for or thereabouts.

“My view as just stated should not, of course, be interpreted as the expression of any opinion as to the likelihood of the pursuers succeeding on liability or, if they do so succeed, on their prospects of recovering the whole of the damages that they seek.”

2 Responses to “Couple sues Diageo for £40k over ‘angels’ share’ fungus damage”

  1. David Smith says:

    I have been on most of the distillery tours in Kentucky. Most, if not all of them, point out the black ageing warehouses”coated in a fungus caused by the angel’s share.”

  2. Sandy Johnston says:

    I live on the same estate in a semi detached house, cleaning the fungus is a yearly chore for me but not my neighbour who does not clean their property. I don’t think anyone could say that this does not affect the value of my property.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

We encourage debate in the comments section and always welcome feedback, but if you spot something you don't think is right, we ask that you leave an accurate email address so we can get back to you if we need to.

Subscribe to our newsletters

The Global Riesling Masters 2019

Deadline : 20th December 2019

The Global Pinot Noir Masters 2020

Deadline : 31st January 2020

Click to view more

The Global Grenache Masters 2019

View Results

Champagne Masters 2019

View Results

Click to view more

Subscribe today to get each issue of The Drinks Business as soon as it's published, plus all the latest breaking news and access to our library of back issues.

Subscribe Today!

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news about the international spirits industry every weekday lunchtime (GMT)