America’s heaviest drinking counties mapped

Counties with lowest rates of binge drinking

1. Idaho, Madison County – 5.9%

2. Utah, Utah County – 6.5%

3. Tennessee, Hancock County – 7.1%

4. Utah, Cache County – 7.6%

5. Tennessee, Johnson County – 7.8%

6. Utah, Rich County – 8.0%

7. Idaho, Franklin County – 8.0%

8. Idaho, Bear Lake County – 8.1%

9. Tennessee, Grainger County – 8.2%

10. Utah, Sevier County – 8.4%

Counties with lowest rates of heavy drinking

1. Tennessee, Hancock County – 2.4%

2. Idaho, Madison County – 2.7%

3. Texas, Collingsworth County – 2.8%

4. Colorado, Kiowa County – 3.1%

5. Utah, Utah County – 3.1%

6. Tennessee, Grainger County – 3.2%

7. Oklahoma, Grant County – 3.2%

8. Kentucky, Bell County – 3.3%

9. Oklahoma, Dewey County – 3.4%

10. Tennessee, Johnson County – 3.4%

Counties with lowest rates of any drinking

1. Idaho, Madison County – 11.0%

2. Utah, Utah County – 14.3%

3. Idaho, Franklin County – 16.6%

4. Utah, Rich County – 17.9%

5. Idaho, Bear Lake County – 17.9%

6. West Virginia, McDowell County – 18.6%

7. Utah, Cache County – 18.6%

8. Tennessee, Hancock County – 18.7%

9. Idaho, Oneida County – 19.3%

10. Utah, Juab County – 19.4%

3 Responses to “America’s heaviest drinking counties mapped”

  1. Thomas Kruse says:

    I think it would be interesting to overlay or compare a similarly colored map with people’s political leanings. We have heard of red and blue states in politics. Compare them to the map of drinking.

  2. Deltahater says:

    What a ridiculously insane study. This is a prime example of how researchers (and I use that term loosely) and reality are miles and miles away.
    Are you really trying to tell me that people in Ft. Myers (where they are generally older) drink more than the young kids in Miami Beach?
    People along the Texas/Mexico border drink excessive amounts, but according to this they drink less than the tree-huggers in VT.
    People in Denver drink more than on Indian reservations with a known drinking problem?

    I wish a professor had done a reality check. This is just shoddy research.

    • Justin says:

      Where are you getting your data from? Without knowing the full methods we cannot determine how bad it good this study is but we can’t argue based purely on experience, anecdotal evidence, and assumptions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

We encourage debate in the comments section and always welcome feedback, but if you spot something you don't think is right, we ask that you leave an accurate email address so we can get back to you if we need to.

Subscribe to our newsletters

The Global Riesling Masters 2019

Deadline : 20th December 2019

The Global Pinot Noir Masters 2020

Deadline : 31st January 2020

Click to view more

Champagne Masters 2019

View Results

Rioja Masters 2019

View Results

Click to view more

Subscribe today to get each issue of The Drinks Business as soon as it's published, plus all the latest breaking news and access to our library of back issues.

Subscribe Today!

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest news about the international spirits industry every weekday lunchtime (GMT)