‘Karas’ trademark causes controversy in Armenia

The attempt by one of Armenia’s biggest producers to clamp down on the use of the word ‘karas’ by other wineries has sparked a bitter dispute in the Caucasian country, with smaller producers claiming the name of the ancient clay vessels isn’t for one company to monopolise.

The clash between Tierras de Armenia and Zorah – both relatively new projects founded by diasporan Armenians – came about when Tierras de Armenia reportedly told Zorah it was no longer allowed to use the word ‘karasì’ (meaning ‘from amphora’) on its labels, claiming it had exclusive rights to the word for its main wine range ‘Karas’ – despite not using the ancient clay vessels to make any of its wines.

Karasses are large clay amphorae; very similar to the ‘qvevri’ used in neighbouring Georgia and which have an equally ancient history.

Under the Soviet Union, Armenia was designated a brandy producing country and production was weighted towards distillation.

The use of karasses faded almost into non-existence as did the skill in making them but a new wave of investment in the country’s wine industry is leading to a revival.

Two prominent figures in the rebirth of the Armenian wine industry are Eduardo Eurnekian and Zorik Gharibian the respective founders of Tierras de Armenia and Zorah.

Eurnekian was born in Argentina and is one of the wealthiest men in that country (the second richest in 2013) and he also owns two wineries there: Bodega del Fin del Mundo and Bodega NQN, both in Patagonia.

Eurnekian has invested hugely in Armenia in recent years and his company even runs the country’s main international airport, where he has invested US$50 million building a new terminal.

Speaking to the drinks business, Gharibian claimed that he had been the first to register the name ‘Karasì’ for one of his wines in 2011 but was told (“correctly,” he added) that he could not have exclusive rights to the word.

Karas Wines registered its name a little later but was apparently given exclusive rights yet is only now, five years later, demanding that Gharibian stop using any reference to the pots on his labels.

He said: “The absurdity lies in the fact that they don’t even ferment or age one single drop of their production in the karas and pretend to forbid Armenian winemakers, who choose to work with the karas, the right to use the word on their wine labels to express what is an ancient and authentic Armenian wine-making method.”

Having gathered around 15 smaller winemakers who also use karasses into a “united front”, Gharibian has been fighting the demand since late last year and the matter has gone before the court of appeal which is due to deliver its verdict this week (Tuesday 13 February).

Karas Wines has been approached for comment by the drinks business but, at the time of publication, had not received any. Eurnekian’s niece who runs the winery, Juliana Del Aguila Eurnekian, was however interviewed by an English-language Armenian paper where she rejected the notion that her uncle was trying to monopolise the word karas and its derivatives and was purely trying to ensure there was no “confusion” between the Karas and Zorah wines. She said the claims that Tierras de Armenia was trying to monopolise the word was a bid to “get more attention”.

However, Tierras de Armenia is also reportedly chasing another Armenian winery, Voskevaz Wine Factory, through the courts on a similar charge relating to the use of the word karas.

When asked why it had taken so long for Karas to challenge Zorah over the name, Eurnekian said it had only recently come to their attention that there may be confusion between the two brands on the part of consumers, especially in export markets.


The real point though, says Gharibian, is not the tussle over a trademark but its wider effect on Armenia reclaiming its viticultural past.

He continued: “We’re also working to revive the karas making traditions of Armenia (my wife is actually a potter). We’ve been searching for potters who were willing to experiment and try and make these huge pots. It’s been very difficult but finally we have found two potters who are now working on trying to build large karasses. We’ve also talked with our local village school where these potters, financed by us, are teaching the young students pottery with the aim of raising a new generation of karas makers.

Zorik Gharibian, founder of Zorah

“In addition we are studying the different clay mines of our region analysing our endemic clays and creating blends from different batches to see which will be best suited for karas making. Not only that, we plan to start collaborating with the head archaeologist of the Areni 1 cave to see what kind of clays and mixtures they were using to make the pots in which they were fermenting wine 3,000-6,000 years ago and also the development of the actual shape of these wine making vessels during the course of history.

“Finally, we are also trying to research our endemic wood fired kilns, non of which survive today, and rebuild them. We plan in the near future to bring all this research together and create a school on our vineyards.

“So, going back to the trademark issue, you can understand that in this is a matter of principal and something that goes far beyond the battle for a name. How a huge corporation who is not interested in working with the karas, nor with Armenia’s endemic varieties for that matter, can pretend to randomly name its brand karas and arrogantly claim exclusive brand usage of the word is pure ignorance and a lack of respect in [sic] our history.”

In an open letter to Eurnekian that was published in the Armenian press, Gharibian said: “The Georgians have elevated their equivalent of ‘karas’ the ‘qvevri‘ to UNESCO Intangible Heritage of Humanity status. The Portuguese have created a DOP for the production of their wines in ‘thala’, while countries like Italy are now investing heavily in the rebirth of amphorae made wines, their heritage from Roman times.

“Armenian winemakers of today and tomorrow, on the other hand, will have to stand on international and domestic platforms and talk of Armenia’s 6,000 year winemaking history using words such as amphora, qvevri or thala and explain that our endemic word ‘karas’ was sold to the highest bidder, a powerful corporation, for personal promotion and brand usage.

“The karas are part of the cultural legacy of this country and belongs to all its people. This is a senseless endeavour. Development and prosperity in Armenia’s winemaking can ONLY come with unity, farsightedness, collective cooperation and most importantly knowledge and respect for one’s heritage. What Karas Wines will achieve with this self-centred action is only division and discord, with the only great loser being the future development of Armenia’s wine industry itself.”

11 Responses to “‘Karas’ trademark causes controversy in Armenia”

  1. Julia Harding MW says:

    Please note that the Georgian preferred spelling is qvevri with a Q (as also used by UNESCO) not kvevri with a K.

    • The letter “q” is certainly preferred by some people, including most wine producers, and is used in the UESCO document that accords the qvevri wine production Intangible Cultural Heritage status. However the official system (Adopted February 2002 by the State Department of Geodesy and Cartography of Georgia and the Institute of Linguistics, Georgian National Academy of Sciences) uses “k”. I believe the attraction for most people is the position of “q” on the keyboard, while for wine-makers it looks more soft and friendly from a marketing point of view. As wine people seem to use it more, personally I now also use “q”, but “k” is certainly not wrong.

      On the subject of the article, I just think it is sad that there is so much squabbling in an little known wine-making country about a word most people in the big markets for wine have not even heard of. If the word “karas” has any value at all for Armenia it needs to be promoted as a common cause by as many people and organisations as possible.

  2. Hagop says:

    Just like Turkey and Azerbaijan have done, now Georgia has stolen Armenia’s cultural history as well with their shameful UNESCO game about “ancient center of wine”, an organization which plays political correctness and politics with Armenia’s history. All three of these countries, all three of them less than 100 years old, simply opportunistically took advantage, of Armenia’s tragic history of going from a very large area to today’s minuscule area. In fact viticulture was started by the ancient Armenians in what is today parts of Georgia, Turkey, Azerbaijan etc. Armenians are not numerous enough or wealthy enough or organized enough to fight for their cultural rights. The result is those that surround Armenia claim her history, and unfortunately for the integrity of history, truth is what suffers, creating generations of ignorant students and scholars who are being deceived with false information.

    • Steve Malikian says:

      100% agree with your comment. Armenians should start to organize and not wait for a messiah like the jews did it before hundred of years. Armenia has three badI neighbours.

    • Tamara Clajus says:

      Ich muss Ihre Bildungslücken leider korrigieren. Georgien ist nicht etwa 100 , sondern 2300 Jahre alt als STAAT. Im Unterschied zu Armenier, die erst im 6. Jahrhundert vor Christus in Urartu ( heutigem Armenien) eingedrungen sind, sind Georgier ein autochthones Volk. Ein klares Beispiel ist auch die armenische Sprache selbst, die nicht zur kaukasischen Sprachgruppe gehört.

  3. Andy says:

    Zorah has no guts to go against the real culprit – the Armenia’s government that granted these rights to Eurnekian.
    Eurnekian, no saint himself, has probably spent millions advertising his brand Karas.
    Zorah, on its turn, was instrumental in causing the prices of Armenian wines go unjustifiably up by pricing his wine way above the reach of an average person in Armenia. He doubled the price of his wine after some international exposure, while, arguably, his wine became no better but simply got better promoted abroad – and this article is a proof.
    Karas is somewhat a bully in the Armenian market, no questions. But it single-handedly showed that it is possible to produce good wine in Armenia and pushed this wine into the masses that were drinking very bad wines produced by industrial winemakers in Armenia. Thanks to Karas, other winemakers of today understood that Armenians remember their wine-drinking history, and discovery of 6100 year old Areni-1 cave, mentioned in this story, helped a lot as well.
    Karas and Zorah should be both taking Armenia’s inept government to court for making stupid decisions. Instead, they are fighting each other and involving these gullible “15 smaller winemakers” too.
    Armenia makes superb wine now. It makes it in ridiculously small quantities, but I would argue that its wine, once discovered, can compete on any market.
    Neither Karas, nor Zorah, or their clueless government, can stop the movement that both Karas and Zorah helped to start and are now trying to kill with their stupid fight against the wrong targets.
    I am not Armenian but know this country well enough to say that Armenian history repeats itself here. Hagop’s comment here, where he blames Armenia’s neighbours, while may be factually correct, is missing the point and repeats these winemaker’s mistake – you all are barking up the wrong trees.

  4. Clajus says:

    Dear reader,
    how kann it be, that Armenier the founder of 8000 old wine-amphore are. Armenier as a Nation exist since 6 sentury BC. They are Not autokton Nation such a Georgian. They kame to the territory of Urartu, beat urartier and settled There. The fact that they do not belong to the autokton kaukasian nation is their language. It belongs to indo-european family. The achievements of georgier to seize is not new. Armenier are famous for this charakter.

  5. Clajus says:

    Wie kann das sein, dass Armenier die Erfinder der 8000 Jahre alten Wein-Amphoren sind, wo sie erst seit dem 6. Jahrhundert vor Christus auf dem heutigem Territorium, was früher Urartu hieß, angekommen sind. D. h. ARMENIER SIND KEINE AUTOCHTONE NATION so wie Georgier. Allein ihre Sprache gehört nicht zu der kaukasischen Sprachreisen. Sie gehört zu indo-europäischen Sprachgruppe. Aber der Versuch die georgische Errungenschaften als ihre eigenen zu verkaufen ist ja nichts neues. Wichtig ist es, die Unwahrheiten erst mal im Raum platzen lassen mit der Hoffnung, es wird immer Jemanden geben, der das glaubt.

  6. marcus says:


    Georgien ist ein schoenes Land. mit schoenen Traditione, jedoch leider zu viel “ArognaZ”
    ials Aussenseiter verstehe ich gar nicht warum Georgien so eifersüchtig auf Armenien ist!?
    macht doch Eure Wein lass den rest die Geniesser es zu beurteilen

    Uebrignes Georgien oihne der Unterstuetzung der russischen Kirche und Russald waere nun zu 100% islamisch !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Sales Advisor

The Whisky Exchange
London, UK

Customer Services Administrator

Speciality Drinks
London, UK

Trading Administrative Assistant

Vin-Exchange Ltd
London, UK

Events Sales Executive

The Drinks Business Hong Kong
Hong Kong

On-Trade Regional Sales Manager

Anthony Byrne Fine Wines
West Midlands, UK

Sales Executive

Wine Source
London, UK

Sales – North East England

Liberty Wines
London, UK

Account Manager

Grape Passions Ltd
Hertfordshire, UK

Account Manager Business Development

Gourvid Limited
London, UK

Pink Rosé Festival

7th Feb 2019

Wine Paris

11th Feb 2019
Click to view more

The Global Fortified Masters 2018

Deadline : 25th January 2019

The Global Pinot Noir Masters 2019

Deadline : 1st February 2019

Click to view more

Rioja Masters 2018

View Results

The Global Beer Competition

View Results

Click to view more