Wine closures: the facts

Other factors

The Vino-lok stopper uses glass and eythylene-vinyl acetate

Finally, it should be stated there are many other factors that affect a winemaker’s decision to choose a particular closure type. These include, critically, market preference, as well as issues such as convenience – screwcaps, for instance, remove the need for a corkscrew (although Amorim has developed the Helix twist-open natural cork).

Indeed, Gago has identified a reason to use cork for wines shipped over long distances – and that’s because a screwcap masks the impact of heat damage.

“A red wine under screwcap looks perfect. It might have been at 50ºC for four weeks but you would never know. On the other hand, a weeping cork suggests exposure to intense heat, as does a lifted capsule due to the cork being pushed up with internal thermal expansion,” he says.

But it should be stressed that winemakers today are unlikely to choose one type of closure for all their wines, choosing different stoppers depending on the wine style and target consumer.

And more innovations will ensure that the battle between different closure types continues. Indeed, Penfolds’ Gago believes the ultimate stopper of the future won’t be made from cork, plastic or aluminium, but sintered glass – a type of breathable glass used for filtering bacteria and fine precipates in scientific analyses. Not only that, but he’s trialling this as a glass-to-glass solution.

While there are glass stoppers on the market already, these contain plastic to hold the closure in place and prevent wine leaking down the sides of the bottleneck.

While they look good, they suffer from the same potential problems as any other closure containing plastics: a longterm concern the material may become brittle and fail, or potentially react with the acids in wine.

So, it’s only with Gago’s innovation that a wine could be housed in an entirely inert container – should that be the ultimate aim. However, this has its own problem: such a solution currently costs far more than the wine itself.

9 Responses to “Wine closures: the facts”

  1. Bruce Devlin says:

    No one ever considers the fact that cork type closures usually come with a capsule, and its impacts on the environment. Weather Tin, Poly, or plastic. It is part of the closure choice, and I’m pretty sure it would skew the environmental results in a different manner. It is rare you find a cork/synthetic bottle without some sort of capsule. An advantage of the screwcap is that it performs both jobs in one unit.

  2. Bottom line is there is no one closure that is perfect for all wines. Research has shown that most wines retail for under $20 per bottle and will be consumed within a week of purchase. No need to use a closure that is expensive or not easily recycled. Consumers do not buy a bottle of wine based on the closure! They buy a wine because it tastes good, is in their budget and is easy to open. Newer consumers are not adept at using a cork screw so why make opening a bottle of wine so complicated? Do you think Coke or Pepsi would enjoy the sales volume they have today if it required a special tool to open each bottle? When will the wine producers learn to simplify the package and get rid of the “mysticism” that surrounds wine.

  3. Michael Quirk says:

    In reference to people not buying wine due to the closure sounds like a the cork industry trying to redeem itself, or simply call it for what it is “Bull”. Ignorance is the biggest issue but as people around the world become more wine savvy and aware of what they do choose (mostly retail) for the easiest and best option available. As for the environmental aspect besides the capsule you also has to consider all the wine that has had to be tipped down the sink due to oxidation, TCA and poor storage all closures may be exposure but the majority of the time it’s the cork closure as the major culprit.
    The inconsistency of the each wine due to the cork quality and being a natural product that it effects every bottle of wine differently so a case of wine has a huge variation of flavours both good and bad. Ordering wine by the glass in a bar or restaurant shows clearly how different each bottle is and very annoying for the bar and the customer.
    As a natural product they degrade and crumble and annoyingly you only remember that when trying to remove the cork. So out come all the tools to try and get rid of all the cork floating in the bottle and the mess all over the bench.
    Even being TCA free and guaranteeing the cork doesn’t mean getting the damn cork out of the bottle any easier. Really we just what great wine not effected by the closure and the Screwcap is the best option at present.

  4. Martin Thompson says:

    Just to present a counterpoint, as I live in Portugal and love wandering the montado – cork oak forests – when I get the time. Aside from the significant environmental benefits, (very fair point regarding the need for a capsule though!) there are multiple downstream social benefits associated to the extraction and processing of cork.

    As a ’79 vintage, I still appreciate pulling a cork and honestly the risk of a tainted bottle doesn’t bother me much but it reminds me that wine still does have some mystical allure, hence the fantastic prices fetched per litre versus a soft drink.

    To be sure there is a market for fast consumption wines that is well served by screw cap closures, they are not to my taste but it has nothing to do with the practicality or technical supremacy of the stopper or even the wine itself. I guess I just really like to hear that pop!

  5. Angeliki Tsioli says:

    Very interesting reading and facts on a controversial subject.
    Just wanted to mention a false number in page 5 of the article, where the detection level of TCA is mentioned to be 0,5 ng/l. Of course this is correct in the previous page, so by 5 ng/l or just 5 ppt.
    I enjoyed reading this,
    Angeliki Tsioli

  6. Angeliki Tsioli says:

    In relation to my previous comment, I admit to have confused the two different kinds of thresholds:

    1. The threshold of detection by humans is about 5 ng/l, while
    2. the threshold of detection by a machine or technique, like that of ND (developed by Amorim) lies far lower than that at 0,5 ng/l.

  7. Tim Keller says:

    What is also missing from this discussion is the topic of VARIANCE in OTR. I developed the first oxygen controlling screwcap closure (the VinPerfect Smartcap ) focusing not just on the oxygen rate – but on how consistent it is. Cork proponents are correct in the fact that some oxygen is needed for higher quality – but the problem is just how wide the range is in terms of OTR performance with cork – it spans several orders of magnitude.

    The other thing to understand is that different suppliers offer oxygen control – but in widely different ranges. My screwcaps go from 0.11 ppm of oxygen per year for the light to 0.27 ppm for the medium+. And you can tell the difference in the aromatics of those wines with that little bit of difference within 6 months.

    By contrast, the tightest oxygen controlling synthetic cork is about 1ppm per year. Wine is pretty resilient and can take that, if not be improved by that in the very short term. – and yes, most are consumed young – but the problem is that the consumer does not see wine as perishable – instead they expect to to hold up if not improve with age. So if you use a closure such as a synthetic cork that is guaranteed to oxidize the wine in 1-2 years, then the responsible thing for producers to do is to add an expiration date to the label.

    Also – one needs to be careful when producers talk about oxygen. Many producers including Diam and the vinolok are very vague when they talk about their oxygen rates. Quality closure producers should not be afraid to publish OTR data in mg or ccO2 units including variance data – yet few do. So I would not take them at their word when they say vague things like “will last 30 years”

  8. Neil Monnens says:

    In 2009, 2012 and 2015 I surveyed my WineRelease.com audience about their closure preference for red vs white wines. Most studies I have seen ask their audience their wine closure preference without discerning between red and white wines. Results are consistent among the years and in 2015 77% preferred natural cork for red wine and 52% preferred screw cap for white wines. Full study is available in the “other” section of WineRelease.com (questions 17 and 18).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our newsletters

Account Manager - Manchester

Black Fire Tequila
Manchester, UK

Marylebone Sales Manager

Philglas & Swiggot
Marylebone, London

Sales Administrator

Les Caves de Pyrène
Guildford, UK

General Manager

3Cs Cider
UK

Buyer

BrandAlley UK LTD
London EC2A

Liquid Production Assistant

Atom Group
Tonbridge, UK

Brand Manager

Hallgarten Druitt
Luton, UK

Brand Manager

Kilchoman Distillery Co Ltd
Edinburgh, UK

Wine Bar Supervisor

Henny's
London, UK

Partner Manager - On-trade - North West

Maverick Drinks
Manchester, UK

Pays d'Oc Tasting

London,United Kingdom
28th Jun 2018

CHILE: From The Very Top To The Downright Hot

Manchester,United Kingdom
2nd Jul 2018

CHILE: From The Very Top To The Downright Hot

Edinburgh,United Kingdom
3rd Jul 2018
Click to view more

The Global Malbec Masters 2017

the drinks business is proud to announce the inaugural Global Malbec Masters 2017

The Global Sparkling Masters 2017

the drinks business is thrilled to announce the launch of The Global Sparkling Masters.

Click to view more