Uni bans SABMiller beers

Students at the University of Edinburgh have banned the sale of all SABMiller beers on campus in protest at the brewer’s perceived treatment of poor countries.

The move follows extensive campaigning from the ActionAid student group, Activista Edinburgh.

ActionAid’s research alleges the multinational beer giant avoids paying millions in tax by shifting profits out of Africa and into tax havens like Switzerland, depriving the world’s poorest countries of tax revenue that could be used to invest in public services.

Meg Doherty from Activista Edinburgh said: “We are absolutely thrilled the union has voted to ban SABMiller within all university bars – it is amazing to see how students can come together and collectively campaign on issues of tax justice, to create sustainable change at a local level, while also having an impact on a huge corperation like SABMiller.

“At a time when there is so much economic injustice at home and around the world, this shows that students feel very passionately about this issue.

“I really hope that this ban will increase the pressure on the company to change the way it does business in developing countries.”

Chris Jordan, ActionAid’s tax justice campaigner, added: “Edinburgh University students have sent a powerful message to Grolsch owner SABMiller, that tax avoidance by multinational companies is no longer acceptable.

“An estimated 250,000 additional African children could get an education if SABMiller stopped dodging its tax in poor countries, so the company needs to have a serious rethink about the way it does business. Bending the rules is no longer acceptable.”

One Response to “Uni bans SABMiller beers”

  1. Zamir says:

    What about not showning only the bad things but also that sabmiller has over 100 campaigns to help people in afrika, aids campaigns, cancer campaigns, economy campaigns, not to mention sabmiller produces a ton of jobs by producing beer in developing countries, these students should study more about theimpact of banning sabmiller´s products , for example ,they didn´t think that these sells don´t represent a thing to sabmiller ,while on the other hand the ammount of jobs lost because of the ban is quite significant and will affect the very poor people and their childrens that depend of samiller, and these are the people they claim to be helping with the ban…..
    pretty bad move if you ask me , or anyone with a little knowledge on economics… but hey gl with your studies!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

We encourage debate in the comments section and always welcome feedback, but if you spot something you don't think is right, we ask that you leave an accurate email address so we can get back to you if we need to.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Rioja Masters 2019

Deadline : 1st August 2019

The Global Cider Masters 2019

Deadline : 7th August 2019

Click to view more

The Global Organic Masters 2019

View Results

Cabernet Sauvignon Masters 2019

View Results

Click to view more