St Emilion 2012 classification trial set for 2020

The long-running saga around the St Emilion classification of 2012 will finally go to court next year, as a Bordeaux magistrate accused the owners of Angélus and Trotte Vieille of illegal interference in the process.

Hubert de Boüard, owner of Château Angélus, and Philippe Castéja, owner of Château Trotte Vieille have been ordered to stand trial by a magistrate on charges of having an “illegal conflict of interest” with regards the classification.

According to a report in today’s Times (21 August), prosecutors allege de Boüard was “present at all stages of the process elaborating the 2012 classification” while Castéja “pulled strings” to ensure the promotion of his own estate.

Both deny the charges and the trial is expected to take place next year at some point.

The 2012 reclassification of the Right Bank Bordeaux AOC led to an immense fall out, with claims by some estates that they had been passed over for promotion to higher ‘cru’ status or even unfairly downgraded while others who were promoted were shown undue favouritism and the whole thing was ‘rigged’.

The blame has fallen largely on the shoulders of both de Boüard and Castéja who are accused of using their influence with the AOC, INAO and personal fortunes to control the outcome of the classification which saw Angélus elevated to the highest level, ‘Grand Cru Classé A’ and Trotte Vieille retain its status as ‘Grand Cru Classé B’ despite acquiring and incorporating a lower ranked estate just prior to the judging.

The claimants in the case who accuse of de Boüard and Castéja of undue involvement are the owners of Château La Tour du Pin Figeac, Corbin-Michotte and Croque-Michotte.

The owners of all three estates felt aggrieved at the way their estates fared in the 2012 classification which they say was unfair.

La Tour du Pin Figeac was not promoted to grand cru classé status; Corbin-Michotte lost its grand cru classé status and Croque-Michotte was refused promotion from grand cru to grand cru classé.

Charges were first levelled in 2013, thrown out and then reintroduced in 2015 which were thrown out again by an administrative court.

The three claimants followed up with criminal charges which were investigated by a magistrate late last year with the

The 2012 classification was also the root cause of an adjacent lawsuit that is almost as long-running.

In 2014 the classification was presented in a book by French journalist Isabelle Saporta as “illustrative” of what she saw as the problems with modern French winemaking.

She called big châteaux owners “cruel” and claimed that they had used the size of their visitor car parks and comfort of their conference rooms as parameters in the judging process which she claimed outright was “fixed”.

De Boüard took her to court on charges of libel, which were thrown out in late 2016.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

We encourage debate in the comments section and always welcome feedback, but if you spot something you don't think is right, we ask that you leave an accurate email address so we can get back to you if we need to.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Global Chardonnay Masters 2019

Deadline : 25th November 2019

The Global Riesling Masters 2019

Deadline : 2nd December 2019

Click to view more

The Global Sparkling Masters 2019

View Results

The Global Cider Masters 2019

View Results

Click to view more