You are currently viewing the International Edition. You can also switch to the Hong Kong Edition.
Monday 21 April 2014

Two-Buck Chuck price goes up

24th January, 2013 by Lucy Shaw

The price of a bottle of “Two-Buck Chuck”, Charles Shaw’s popular California wine brand, has ended its 11-year run at US$1.99.

Two Buck Chuck

This week, Trader Joe’s grocery stores throughout California has put the price of “Two-Buck Chuck” up to $2.49 a bottle.

The wine has maintained its $1.99 price tag in California since it came onto the market 11 years ago, but ranges from $2.49-$3.79 in other US states due to tax and distribution costs.

“We’ve held a $1.99 retail price for 11 years.

“Quite a bit has happened during those years and the move to $2.49 allows us to offer the same quality that has made the wine famous the world over,” Alison Mochizuki, spokeswoman for Trader Joe’s, told the Los Angeles Business Journal.

“In general, our retail prices change only when our costs change,” she added.

Trader Joe’s sells 5 million cases of Charles Shaw wines a year, and has sold more than 600 million bottles of “Two-Buck Chuck” since it first hit the shelves in 2002.

The $2.49 price tag has shoppers searching for new names, with some customers joking that the brand should now be called “Upchuck.”

Owners of the Charles Shaw brand, the Bronco Wine Company, said it was able to keep the price so low because it owns 18,000 hectares of vineyard, which insulated it from large fluctuations in grape prices.

But bad harvests in 2011 and 2012 have impacted on the price.

The Charles Shaw range is formed of a number of single varietal wines, including Chardonnay, Merlot, Cabernet, Sauvignon, Shiraz, Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Grigio, White Zinfandel and Valdigué in the style of Beaujolais Nouveau.

Earlier this month we reported that the average price for a bottle of wine in the UK off-trade has broken through the £5 barrier for the first time to £5.03.

2 Responses to “Two-Buck Chuck price goes up”

  1. Rob Lewis says:

    I bought a bottle of one of their reds a couple of years ago. According to the label, it was a year old. According to my taste buds, It was maybe a couple of weeks old. I used to work at a winery, and I think I know what I’m talking about.
    You could say “What do you expect for $2?” And I would say “I expect them not to mislabel their vintages.”

    • Jerry Helffrich says:

      Well, I’m not a wine connoisseur, but I did have this sensation that Two Buck Chuck was very raw, and a sort of WTF?! Why not put something in it or let it age? I suppose it has expanded the user base for wine, though. Isn’t that OK?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

If that's interesting, how about these?