New study strengthens case against soil-based minerality

13th October, 2015 by Darren Smith

A new study has provided further evidence that the perception of minerality in wine is not linked to soil.

A link between soil and mineral flavours in wine continues to be suggested by many winemakers, particularly in the Old World (Photo: Wikipedia)

The findings emerged from the second part of a two-year research project, titled ‘Minerality in Wines‘, conducted by Spanish wine analysis company Excell Ibérica and Outlook Wine.

The results of the study indicate that the chemical composition of wines and their perception as ‘mineral’ are not directly linked to the minerals in a vineyard’s soil.

Rather, a variety of volatile chemical compounds derived from the metabolism of the vine, the fermentation of yeast and bacteria, as well as from techniques applied in the winemaking and ageing processes, were found to be responsible for the….

Continue reading

Get unlimited access to The Drinks Business, from just £10.75 per month

Join The Drinks Business
Already a subscriber?

9 Responses to “New study strengthens case against soil-based minerality”

  1. I have long been of the opinion that the elusive description of minerality is at best related to perception of acidity in wine. That it is no way directly related to the mineral content of the soil has been obvious by the lack of mechanism for the vine to absorb most minerals, and the general confusion of most people between rocks and minerals. The classic description of “it is like licking a rock” is problematic in that a clean rock is not particularly water soluble, and therefore has no actual taste. The general disagreement over which wines exhibit the characteristic has been enough for me to avoid the term outright. If there is now agreement on what the term represents, I can only hope it will be used as such.

  2. Myron redford says:

    It would be interesting to see if these “minerality”compounds & esthers show up more often or more intensely in regions often described by the term minerality, such as Sancerre.

  3. craig says:

    Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. Can we call it something else? Texture? Savouriness?

  4. Kevin Pogue says:

    If you dismiss variations in the sensory components of wine due to “terroir”, you must also dismiss variations ascribed to “vintage”. Terroir is about much more than the “mineral” (really plant available nutrient) component of soil. Climate is the most important component of terroir and it varies with regard to both space (site), and time (vintage). Soil minerals (e.g. quartz, feldspar, calcite, clay) are not present AT ALL in wine. What’s present are nutritive elements (mostly cations) in the minute concentrations that are required by the plant to grow and produce various organic compounds – including those that, during fermentation lead to taste and aroma compounds. At present, our understanding of role of soil-derived nutritive elements in the synthesis of flavor and aroma compounds is almost non-existent. To say that “minerality is not related to minerals absorbed by grapevines” is stating the obvious and is something that was never even taken seriously by the scientific community. To say that “grapevines and the wines produced from them are unaffected by variations in the availability and concentrations of mineral-derived nutrients” is ridiculous – as ridiculous as saying that your health is unaffected by vitamins.

  5. chris rawlings says:

    I completely agree with Myron. Can we have an article to this cause please DB?

  6. Lucie says:

    Kevin Pogue’s reply is spot on here. With a team of geologists in Virginia funded by the Virginia Wine Board, I have been studying the role of soil mineralogy on the uptake of potassium in wine grapes. The answer is YES soil mineralogy influences the uptake of potassium and yes, combined with all those wonderful viticultural variations due to rootstock, cultivar, vintage, etc., this can affect the potassium in the fruit. K in the fruit relates strongly to pH in wine and for many, acid balance/acidity is a major component in the impression of “minerality.”

  7. Typically a new world article. You can not taste minerality, but it does have its influence on the taste. Australians prove the origin of wines by linking chromatographic results to ‘terroir’.

  8. Completely agree with Kevin Pogue. Simply looking at Mosel, Nahe, Pfalz and Alsace shows that soil and mineral content has distinctive influence on the wines.

  9. Fist : You can look at the chemical definition of minerality in mineral waters : …

    Minerals are not organics compounds. I’m just wondering why son many people are trying to find, to associate an organic chemical support on the minerals characters…

    Then, the question is if there’s an influence of the minerals cations concentration on the acidity; sugar, tannins, alcohol…

    This is not because we don’t identifie a relation between minerality taste and soils, that there’s not relation.

    David Lefebvre

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our newsletters