Close Menu
News

NHS ‘shouldn’t pay’ for alcohol treatment

The majority of British people think the National Health Service should refuse to treat patients with alcohol addiction problems free-of-charge.

The survey showed people are unsympathetic to the idea of the taxpayer funding the treatment of those with alcohol addiction issues (Photo: Wiki)

As many as 84% of people argue that the £136 million spent annually on alcohol and drug addiction services should be at least in part covered by those who use them.

That leaves just 16% of people who think that such services should remain free at the point of use – a founding principle of the NHS.

British people are similarly uncompromising when it comes to more serious treatment, such as full liver transplants for those who have damaged theirs through heavy drinking.

Just under half of the 4000 respondents (48%) to the Benenden Health Report 2015 survey believe that transplants should still be available for free on the NHS for these patients.

A further 23% believed patients with alcohol issues should contribute to the cost, while 9% said that there should be absolutely no liver transplants for people with drinking problems. That leaves just 20% saying that transplants should remain free, whatever the cause.

Around 236 liver transplants are carried out each year as a result of alcohol abuse, at a cost of roughly £70,000 each. When surveyed, people vastly underestimated the cost of a liver transplant, with the average estimate being around just £12,000.

Commenting on the research, Dr John Miles of Benenden said, “Whilst in many cases people will fall ill or need the help of the NHS through no fault of our own, there are also instances where poor lifestyle choices can contribute heavily to causing illness.”

“It’s now time to take action. To start taking some real responsibility for our own health. This means taking time to learn about good nutrition, the benefits of responsible drinking and understanding that there’s more to life than how good we look in our Facebook profile picture,” he said.

4 responses to “NHS ‘shouldn’t pay’ for alcohol treatment”

  1. Jill Marshall says:

    And how do those same people feel about treatment for obesity or smoking-related diseases? Oh I guess the smokers are OK as they pay masses of tax and fund the NHS in the first place; but the Obese brigade don’t pay any extra taxes – in fact the supermarkets try and offer them the substances that are killing them as cheap as possible. Alcoholism is a disease, people do not choose to be alcoholics; they deserve treatment on the NHS just like everyone else.

  2. Tina says:

    Stop chasing Cannabis growers and legalise it.

    Save money NO CRIME, NO POLICE and GIVE MONEY TO NHS AND EDUCATION. Cannabis for medical purposes are essential for cancer related illnesses, I would ignor Uk governments advise?

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/104349

  3. AnthonyBrook says:

    Treatment in all cases should be free to all uk residents!

  4. b says:

    No way, if an alcoholic can’t abstain from drinking for at least a few months than they should never be allowed a liver transplant costing £70,000. Most of these alcoholics are already rec alot of gov money through being physically disabled….a.self inflicted disability, I might add. Some treatment should never be given. Why should a non-alcoholic be waiting & possibly die on the waiting list while an alcoholic is allowed it…just to keep on abusing. There aren’t enough to go around-17 percent die waiting on that list, my vote is that the alcoholics should be the ones left to die. They’ve given up on life a long time ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

It looks like you're in Asia, would you like to be redirected to the Drinks Business Asia edition?

Yes, take me to the Asia edition No