This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
News
Health experts call for minimum pricing
A group of leading doctors and academics has claimed that a minimum price for alcohol in the UK would prevent thousands of drink-related deaths and diseases.
As MPs prepare to debate alcohol taxation in Westminster this afternoon, the group urged the government to take “bold action” and follow Scotland’s lead by introducing a minimum price per unit for alcoholic drinks.
The government is set to announce its new “alcohol strategy” early next year, but health secretary Andrew Lansley has so far been unmoved on calls to bring in minimum pricing due to concerns it would contravene EU competition rules.
However, the group of 19 experts claimed in a letter to The Daily Telegraph that the pricing model set to be introduced in Scotland represents a “simple and effective” solution for tackling alcohol-related problems in society.
In the letter, the group said alcohol was linked to 13,000 new cases of cancer each year and associated with one in four deaths of people in the 15-to-24 age group.
The letter was signed by the British Medical Association, the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Nursing among others.
It said: “We need to narrow the price gap between alcohol bought in bars and restaurants with alcohol bought in supermarkets and off-licences, to make bulk discounts and pocket-money prices a thing of the past.”
It goes on to say the government “urgently need to raise the price of cheap drink” due to a “wealth of evidence” linking the cost of alcohol and levels of harm.
The UK’s coalition government has already announced a ban on selling alcoholic drinks below cost price, which comes into effect in England and Wales in April next year.
Professor Sir Ian Gilmore, special adviser to the Royal College of Physicians, said the introduction of a minimum price of 50p per unit of alcohol could save nearly 10,000 lives a year.
He told the Telegraph that the government had acknowledged the importance of price by introducing a ban on selling alcohol below cost, but said this did not go “far enough”.
“We’re talking about saving lives here,” he said. “It’s not just about damage to individuals who drink too much but their children and unborn babies and the victims of alcohol-related crime.
“The most effective way of targeting the heaviest drinkers is probably through a minimum unit price.”
The controversial measure is not without its critics, many of whom claim the introduction of minimum pricing would be unfair on those drinkers who do not have or cause problems.
Furthermore, Anne Milton, public health minister for England, told MPs in October that minimum pricing could be open to legal challenges under European competition laws.
The government may just sit tight and wait to see what happens when Scotland tries to push through its own minimum pricing scheme in the new year.
Many in the trade are of the belief that, while the bill may get the approval of the Scottish government, it is doomed to failure when it goes before Europe.
Campbell Evans, director of government and consumer affairs at the SWA, told the drinks business of his belief that the introduction of a minimum price on alcohol is likely to be blocked by the European courts, if not even the UK’s own government.
“The Health and Sport Committee will look at it in February and will hold a number of discussions on the measure, but with the Scottish National Party holding a majority on that Council, we can reasonably expect they will approve it.
“It then, however, has to go before Westminster who are more aware of the legal implications of the measure in regards to international trade laws.
“It would then have to go before Europe, and I can’t see the European court changing its principles.
“The Scottish government seems to be of the belief it can change long-standing international trade laws, but Europe will certainly see the issue differently.”
Jeremy Beadles, chief executive of the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, added: “There is no evidence minimum pricing will address the problem of alcohol misuse and the most recent government figures show alcohol consumption per capita fell in Scotland last year.”
Estimates provided by Nielsen suggest that 74% of current UK beer sales are below the possible minimum price of 50p per unit, while 63% of wine sales would also be under the new limit.
For more on the potential impact of minimum pricing, see the December edition of the drinks business.
Why is the industry – both retailers and manufacturers – not standing up to be properly counted in this argument? My understanding is that now in Scotland many come over the border into the England to buy cheaper booze. Any similar arrangement in England is just going to bring back the era of the booze cruise to France etc and result in a huge loss of revenue to the country both in terms of retail sales as well as taxes on the alcohol.
People will not drink less just because the price goes up – this is non-intellectual nonsense of the highest order. The same people who presently drink too much will carry on, the rest of us will just have to pay that much more for our perfectly sensible past-time and enjoyment – or have to go to France, stock up and bring it all back in one go.
The problem is not the 95% who drink sensibly so why should we have to suffer – as we do with so many other things – because of this tiny minority? Come on industry, we need to make the case for the opposition otherwise we run the risk that our democracy will be overun by just 19 nannies.
Has anyone ever considered how many sales of alcohol are made in the on trade to consumers who are drunk?
l thought this was illegal. It certainly is in the off trade.
What about policing the on-trade and either prosecuting the ‘salesperson’ or withdrawing the licence for the premises. Yes, there will be a cost to the policing but on the counter argument there will be a saving to the NHS if the overall effect is to reduce the abuse and the consequences.
If we consider abuse, the on trade must face up to the reality that they will face a considerable amount of abuse.
However, l am sure that facing the prospect of the loss of job or licence they will ‘man up’ and attack the problem head on.
l am not foolish enough to think that anyone going out to pub, club or wine bar cannot purchase alcohol at ‘off trade’ premises, and consume that alcohol before arriving at their chosen venue. Refusal of entry is surely the right of the proprietor?
This suggestion is maybe a little contentious and l must say that l have not come across anyone else who shares this viewpoint.