You are currently viewing the International Edition. You can also switch to the Hong Kong Edition.
Friday 31 October 2014

Irreparable damage done to Bordeaux

22nd December, 2011 by Patrick Schmitt

UK wine merchants have expressed their concern for next spring’s en primeur campaign in the wake this year’s price increases.

Speaking to db, Corney & Barrow MD Adam Brett-Smith said of 2011 Left Bank Bordeaux, “Unless they do something of unbelievable drama there is going to be no interest at all.”

Referring to Bordeaux pricing of the 2010 vintage, he added, “As so often in Bordeaux, they pushed it too far, so there has been a correction.”

The only buyers of the first growths and other expensive labels en primeur this year were, he said, “The people who had an awful lot of money and really wanted the best and curiously, a lot of very young people coming in for the first time.”

However, he added that the top châteaux had lost “the loyal bread and butter customer”.

Similarly, Bordeaux Index MD Gary Boom said that the Bordelais had “done themselves irreparable damage” by alienating their traditional customer with recent en primeur price increases.

“I haven’t sold a case of first growth Bordeaux for months to a person in the UK who I think is going to drink it,” he added.

Meanwhile, Liv-ex, writing in January’s upcoming issue of the drinks business, pointed out that due to the recent market correction, now might be a good time to buy older vintages (1995-2006) of first growths, other than Lafite.

“If we look back to the 2008 correction, which had a similar trajectory to the current one, the low point of the market – and hence the best time to buy – proved to be December 2008.”

 

2 Responses to “Irreparable damage done to Bordeaux”

  1. My goodness Adam – “unbelievable drama.” Followed by Mr Boom’s comment – “done themselves (the Bordelais) irreparable damage.” Have both of them forgotten the 1972 vintage? Sure, Bordeaux people are greedy, just like every other human being on earth. They merely follow the market which any student of marketing is taught to observe. The route of the problem is the daft money being paid to daft people who probably pay no income tax at the encouragement of daft politicians.

  2. Methinks Mr. Brett-Smith’s observation is rather premature. He did get some publicity, however.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

If that's interesting, how about these?