French authorities probe winemaker’s death

The French criminal court has launched its first ever criminal investigation into the death of a winemaker caused by sustained pesticide use over four decades.

Spraying-vineyardJames-Bernard Murat died of lung cancer in 2012 having spent 40 years spraying carcinogenic pesticides on his Bordeaux grapes at his vineyard in southwestern France.

The pesticides, which contain sodium arsenite, are now banned, but were used by Murat to treat his vines for esca, a parasitic fungi that attacks the trunks of grapevines.

The French court has now launched an inquiry into Murat’s “involuntary homicide” after his death was formally linked to his profession.

According to reports by The Telegraph, the court is seeking to determine those responsible for “involuntary homicide, fraud and failure to offer aid”.

“Until now, the official line has been that my father got cancer because he had wrongly used the products sold to him”, said Murat’s daughter Valérie, who filed a legal complaint in April.

“The industrial chemical giants are now going to have to take responsibility for their role [in his death],” she told Nouvel Obs.

Murat only used the pesticides three times a year, but over a sustained 40 year period.

“The companies have always sworn that chronic inhalation in “homoeopathic doses” posed no danger to human health”, added Ms Murat. “The inquiry will determine who was right and who was lying.”

The case is likely to set a precedent over the use of pesticides in France, perhaps opening the door to cases against other pesticide producers.

Ms Murat’s lawyer, François Lafforgue, said around 40 legal complaints are currently under way concerning French farmers suffering from diseases they say are linked to pesticide use.

While France is Europe’s biggest user of pesticides, spraying around 60,000 tonnes on crops every year, it has pledged to cut pesticide use by 50% by 2018.

One Response to “French authorities probe winemaker’s death”

  1. guillemet says:

    Much hype around this case. Wouldn’t it be better to wait after the result of trial, before writing ?
    Actually some observations can be done, even if we don’t have the details of the case :

    – 3 times a year seem quite much, as these products were generally used once, in winter, and recommanded so,

    – did Mr Murat take all recommanded and madatory steps to protect himself ( no drinking, smoking, eating while spraying, or after spraying without havibng washed his hands, mask, gloves, protective overall…) ? If so, he was propably the only one in the whole country, in the 60ies and 70s !

    – had he ever smoked ? When he was a soldier, when the government gave a number of cigarettes (I don’t remember how many packets, two ,) to any recruit ? Did he ever live with a smoker ?

    – about tobacco, which is well known to cause lung cancer, how can it still be sold ? Isn’t the state buiding a grimm future, loaded with a many trials, where it will be condemned for having killed thousands ?

    Ms Murat’s lawyer, François Lafforgue, said around 40 legal complaints are currently under way. I would have expected many more, given the money at stake !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

We encourage debate in the comments section and always welcome feedback, but if you spot something you don't think is right, we ask that you leave an accurate email address so we can get back to you if we need to.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Rioja Masters 2019

Deadline : 1st August 2019

Champagne Masters 2019

Deadline : 12th August 2019

Click to view more

The Global Organic Masters 2019

View Results

Cabernet Sauvignon Masters 2019

View Results

Click to view more