Craft brewer wins trademark battle

An Australian craft brewer has won the right to continue using its name “Wayward” after a two-year legal battle with beer giant SABMiller, who claimed it was too similar to their brand “Haywards”.

GF_729_wayward_pete-620x0Wayward Brewing Company, which produces about 30,000 litres of beer annually, was brought to court by SABMiller’s Indian subsidiary over claims the craft brewer was infringing on the trademarking of its brands Haywards 5000 and Haywards 2000.

Pete Philip, the brewery’s owner and founder, described the lawsuit as a “David and Goliath” situation and attributed the global brewer’s actions to fears over the threat posed by craft beer’s growing share of the Australian beer market – despite the industry holding just 2% of the market.

wayward-brewing-logoIn bringing the case, SABMiller cited 14 reasons why Wayward Brewing should not be awarded a trademark for their brand, one being that it could have traded off the popularity of its Indian beer, all of which were rejected by the Australian Trade Marks office.

Haywards beer accounted for less than 0.006% of the total Australia beer market in 2011/12.

Following the victory Philips said in a statement on its website: “Maybe they thought that a little guy wouldn’t stand up to them, but I always knew we were in the right and I wasn’t going to give up without a fight.

“We always believed that the opposition was totally without foundation as our Wayward trademark is completely different in sound, appearance and meaning to their brands.”

“It is a great feeling to be finally vindicated in our victory but it has cost us a lot of time, money and stress wondering whether this massive global brewer was going to force us to change our brand and start all over with a new name.”

“For me it was always personal as I have put my heart and soul into building this business.”H-5000

In a written summary of the case, hearings officer Michael Kirov said: “I do not believe that the [Wayward] Mark is so similar to the Haywards marks as used that deception or confusion amongst a significant or substantial number of the beer drinking public in Australia would be likely in any event”.

SABMiller have been ordered to pay costs of the case, estimated at AUS$20,000, to the craft brewer which up until now been known as a ‘Gypsy Brewery’, meaning that it used equipment from other breweries around Sydney.

From 2015 it will start brewing from a dedicated site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note that comments are subject to our posting guidelines in accordance with the Defamation Act 2013. Posts containing swear words, discrimination, offensive language and libellous or defamatory comments will not be approved.

Subscribe to our newsletters

Marketing Executive

Harviestoun Brewery
London, UK

Customer Services

Felix Solis Avantis UK Ltd
Canterbury, UK

Head Distiller & Ambassador at Little Bird

Little Bird Gin
London, UK

Brand Marketing Manager

Maverick Drinks
London, UK

PR and Communications Manager

Maverick Drinks
London, UK

Various Sales Roles

Amathus Drinks Plc
Bristol, Cardiff, Cornwall, Devon, Leeds and Birmingham

Assistant Buyer

Liberty Wines
London, UK

Partner Development Manager

Maverick Drinks
Tunbridge Wells, UK

Partner Manager - Wholesale

Maverick Drinks
Tunbridge Wells, UK

db Awards 2018

London,UK
22nd May 2018

The City Wine & Spirits Show

London,United Kingdom
12th Oct 2018
Click to view more

The Global Malbec Masters 2017

the drinks business is proud to announce the inaugural Global Malbec Masters 2017

The Global Sparkling Masters 2017

the drinks business is thrilled to announce the launch of The Global Sparkling Masters.

Click to view more