You are currently viewing the International Edition. You can also switch to the Hong Kong Edition.
Friday 31 October 2014

Scratch and sniff wine book released

17th October, 2013 by Lucy Shaw

Master sommelier Richard Betts has released a “scratch and sniff” wine book that aims to make wine easier to understand for novices.

Nearly five years in the making, The Essential Scratch and Sniff Guide to Becoming a Wine Expert, illustrated by Wendy MacNaughton, went on sale this week.

“People are hungry to be included in this conversation,” Betts told Colorado news website the Daily Camera, admitting that wine is sometimes viewed as the domain of “fusty old guys.”

The book features 16 different scents found in red and white wine, divided up into three key aroma categories: fruit, wood and earth.

At the back of the tome is a fold out aroma wheel, which breaks down wines by grape, region and style.

Scratch and sniff circles help the reader to distinguish between red and black fruit aromas in red wines and stone fruit versus more exotic fruit in white wines.

The book also explains concepts such as terroir and the use of oak, and explores more unusual smells found in wine from butter and flowers to grass and bacon.

US-born Betts came up with the idea for the book while on a ski trip with a friend in which wine played a key role.

Translating the book from an idea into a reality took four-and-a-half years, with Betts finally finding a publisher in Ohio willing to take a punt on it.

Betts told the Daily Camera that the book has been well received by wine professionals, describing it as “one of the most fun things I’ve ever done.”

No Responses to “Scratch and sniff wine book released”

  1. CS says:

    Richard Betts was not born in Aspen…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

If that's interesting, how about these?