You are currently viewing the International Edition. You can also switch to the Hong Kong Edition.
Friday 29 August 2014

If that's interesting, how about these?

Top 10 vineyard investments

19th April, 2012 by db_staff

7. Ukraine 

HarvestingThe Ukraine has a lot of potential as there is continuing development in the region in terms of vineyards and grapevines.

After an almost complete lack of foreign wines in Ukraine before independence, the import of wine began in the early 1990s with a simultaneous drop in Ukrainian wine production.

Wine import became more or less regular over the 1990s. This has seen something of a sea change as wine production volumes have grown over the last several years since the 1990s. The most significant growth, as reported by official statistics, was in the period 1999-2002.

This year alone it has been predicted that 332,000 grapevines will be bought to establish new vineyards. This leaves a lot of potential for investment.

A key feature is that quality control is becoming important in the region, so that good quality wines can be produced more often. 

5 Responses to “Top 10 vineyard investments”

  1. Bisso Atanassov says:

    >> 4,000-liter quevris, or large clay vessels, that are buried in the ground. Quevris are cost-efficient, if not very scientific and it produces good concentrated red wine.

    First of all, quevris are of different size, not obligatory 4000 l. I’m not sure what’s the cost-efficiency of the quevris (they are cheaper than oak for sure) but from scientific point of view they are a vessel with high oxydizing potential (clay is porous and the quevris are not coated from the inside as a rule) so the wine inside tends to oxydize fast and die even faster (given that no topping-up is previewed by the “cost-efficient” system – see picture). Some of the wine is kept with the stems for a longer time than you can imagine. Not a single Georgian winemaker could answer my question how on earth they clean to sterility a porous uncoated vessel that is buried in the ground. As the answer is – there’s no way. So at the end you get a very … ahmm … specific wine, biologically unstable (in the better case, in the worse – contaminated by mould, fungi and other unknown bacteria) and oxydized, that tends to “dismantle” very fast. But, of course, it’s “natural”, “cost-efficient” and with the so called “gout de terroir”. In general the contemporary consumer refuses to drink such wines (I mean the taste as a whole) and that’s why Georgia can’t sell abroad even half of what they were selling to Russia (as Russians drink everything that burns, i.e. contains alcohol, and don’t care).

    There are some interesting new wines though, but none the less they are a niche product, only for connoisseurs. Not sure if this is enough to put Georgia among the Top-10 emerging wine regions.

  2. Dom says:

    I have tried quite a bit of Georgian wine and have only had bad experiences with wine from quevris. The ones I have tried have had very odd aromas, the wines have been very vegetal and poo-ey, not in a Burgundian farmyardy way, but very unpleasant. Maybe I have just been unluck so far.

  3. Don says:

    Huge ommission – Argentina has to be included. Terroir very accessible and available in Mendoza region. Weather dependable and most vineyards are at elevaton in Andes foothills imparting extraordinary qualities. Malbec is taking over the red wine world with Cab close second. Costs, compared to many locations, are very low with lots of room to grow.

  4. Zakkie Bester says:

    I follow the following simple filosophy : Life is to short to drink bad wines.
    Why bother to drink this awfull wines?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>