You are currently viewing the International Edition. You can also switch to the Hong Kong Edition.
| Log Out | Log In |
Thursday 17 May 2012

CLOSURES: Something in the Air

6th February, 2008 by db_staff - This article is over multiple pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Mark Coleman, director, Neocork Technologies “I would say that performance is most important but only if it corresponds to the consumer’s ‘perception’ of quality, which, of course, differs from market to market. For example, a crown cap may be one of the more technically superior closures, yet if it doesn’t sell your wine due to consumer perception then its performance is not very important. I personally believe the closure debate is a bit overdone at this point as most wineries are beginning to understand there is not any one silver bullet. I think the closure debate needs to evolve into a closure ‘education’, so wineries can better understand which closure works best.”
Malcolm Thompson, vice president, Nomacorc “Some say that perception is reality, but when it comes to wine closures, performance is the bottom line. If a closure does not appropriately protect the wine, wine quality suffers. Eventually the winery’s brand loses cache and share. We’ve seen that a significant percentage of wine is negatively affected by oxygen, of which a majority share is attributed to the closure performance. Therefore, we’ve invested heavily in better understanding the impact of oxygen.”

 © db February 2008

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

* Copy this password:

* Type or paste password here:

Topics in this article

Archive, February 2008 Issue 67,

If that's interesting, how about these?